ChaseLawyers

Tap a star to rate

What ChaseLawyers is

ChaseLawyers is an entertainment law firm with offices in Miami and New York. Its adult entertainment page describes the practice as discreet, judgment-free counsel on compliance, contracts, content protection and disputes, and website and platform operators are one of the client groups it names, alongside performers, independent content creators and studios. Client payments under the site's terms go to The Law Office of Barry Oliver Chase PA, and the team page lists Barry Oliver Chase as senior partner. The Miami office is at 21 SE First Avenue, Suite 700, and the New York office is at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 2nd Floor. The firm's pages state a headline claim of 3k+ contracts protecting rights and negotiating terms in the U.S. and globally, which is the firm's own figure.

This is a general entertainment practice, not an adult-only boutique. The site navigation lists music industry law, intellectual property, immigration and visas, film and literary work, business and digital, talent representation and sports law alongside adult entertainment. For a site operator the useful fact is that the adult page treats websites, platforms and studios as a client group of its own, with a stated service list for each of that group's problems: record keeping, age-verification planning, user terms, licensing and content protection. The firm's 2257 articles describe the same client base as adult production companies, streaming websites, subscription platforms, individual performers and large distribution networks.

What it sells an operator

The adult page groups the work under three headings. Under compliance, the firm lists setting up 18 U.S.C. § 2257 age and identity record keeping and custodian-of-records statements, assessing state age-verification laws for websites and apps that serve U.S. users, building consent, verification and notice-and-removal processes for platforms, and aligning operations with payment processor, hosting and app store policies.

Under contracts, it lists drafting performer agreements, model releases and consent documentation, negotiating production, licensing, distribution and revenue-share deals, reviewing independent contractor agreements, and preparing collaboration agreements for creators who produce content with others. For platforms specifically, the FAQ says the firm drafts Terms of Service, privacy policies, subscription terms, content and takedown policies and creator agreements tailored to the platform. It adds that good policies explain age requirements, payment and refund rules, prohibited content and how complaints are handled.

Under content and brand protection, it lists registering copyrights and trademarks for a studio or brand name, sending DMCA takedown notices to sites, hosts and search engines, acting on intimate images shared without consent, deepfakes and impersonation accounts, and counseling on First Amendment, censorship and content-moderation issues. The FAQ says the firm can send notices, track repeat infringers and pursue further legal action when takedowns alone do not solve the problem. A separate copyright page describes registration, cease-and-desist letters, licensing, transfers recorded with the U.S. Copyright Office, and claims in federal court or before the Copyright Claims Board.

An operator starting out is also covered: the FAQ says the firm helps with entity formation, contracts, brand trademarks, website policies and 2257 and age-verification planning before launch, so that payment processors, hosting providers and regulators raise fewer problems later. The step-by-step process on the same page includes mapping the federal, state and local rules that apply to a business model and anticipating payment processor and platform requirements before launch.

Terms that decide the choice

Fees are the point where the pages say least. The FAQ states that the firm offers flat-fee packages for common services such as contract reviews and policy drafting, plus hourly and retainer options for ongoing compliance or disputes. No rate, package price or retainer size is published. The first consultation is described as free and confidential, and the firm says it explains the scope and expected fees clearly before any work begins. The site's terms and conditions add that fees are charged to the client's card by The Law Office of Barry Oliver Chase PA, that refunds are given only in extraordinary circumstances, and that the agreement is governed by Florida law.

The confidentiality answer is specific: communications with the firm's attorneys for the purpose of seeking legal advice are generally protected by attorney-client privilege and the duty of confidentiality, so an operator can share sensitive business details openly. The firm adds that it handles adult industry matters discreetly and does not judge the lawful work its clients do. That is the closest thing the pages offer to a stance on adult content as a client category. One caveat sits in the website terms: messages sent through the website itself are treated as non-confidential, and no relationship beyond the one set by a separate contract is created by using the site.

The firm's articles show how it frames the subject. A February 2025 post on setting up an adult online business covers business structure, licenses, separate financial accounts, 2257 requirements, age-verification laws, user terms and privacy policies, and intellectual property. In it, the firm says 2257 duties apply not only to content creators but also to platforms hosting user-generated content if they exercise editorial control, and it recommends designating a custodian of records and running regular internal audits. On age verification, the post names Utah, Texas, Louisiana and Virginia as states with laws for adult websites, and it mentions the UK Online Safety Act and the EU Digital Services Act. The FAQ states that a growing number of states, including Florida, require certain websites with substantial adult content to verify users are adults, and that the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Texas's age-verification law in 2025. These are the firm's statements of its own reading of the law, and the post carries a disclaimer that it is general information and not legal advice.

The pages do not say which age-verification vendors the firm works with, whether it acts as a 2257 custodian itself, or how long an engagement runs. The service wording is about setting up records and custodian statements, not holding them.

Getting started and support

The first step is a free consultation booked by form or phone. The process described on the adult page has the operator share the situation privately, have compliance gaps, contract risks and urgent issues identified, and hear back within 24 hours with next steps. The contact form promises a response within 24 hours too. The contact page lists office hours of 10:00 AM to 18:00 PM, Monday through Sunday, for both offices, plus a general email address, and a make-a-payment page is linked for clients. A free eBook is offered through a form on the page.

The firm describes ongoing work as well as one-off drafting: tracking new age-verification and online safety laws, updating policies and contracts as a business grows or enters new markets, and answering new questions as they come up.

Company and fit

The pages name the brand ChaseLawyers with a registered mark. The homepage describes a boutique firm with 8 attorneys barred in 3 states, claims over three decades of experience and 1000+ clients helped, and names its partners: Barry Chase for entertainment and media law, Gregory Bloom for entertainment and sports law and Alexander Loveyko for entertainment and Internet law. These are the firm's own figures. The pages do not give a founding year or a list of adult clients, and they do not name any adult industry association membership.

The firm suits an operator who needs documents and advice rather than software: a new tube or paysite that needs user terms, a privacy policy, takedown procedures and a view on state age-verification rules before launch, or an established site with a piracy problem and a need for registered copyrights behind its DMCA notices. It also suits a studio that wants performer agreements and releases drafted. The caveats are that fees are quoted after a consultation and that the practice is broad, with adult work as one area among many. The strength is the combination on one page: record keeping, platform policies, contracts and enforcement, offered from two offices with a free first conversation.

More in Adult lawyers and 2257 compliance

See all